So, my day went really well. I slept in (Yay!) and then I got a shower. I got to play with my baby girl a bit, and then we went to my parent-in-laws' place. Which is always fun, because they have a fabulous home.
While there, I helped my father-in-law install some new lighting out front. Really, most of the work was already done, as my good friend Shawn was already there. I did help, though!
Afterwards, we had a good day of playing games and talking. One particular game was a lot of fun! It's called the Wrong Game, and it focuses on being wrong. That's right! Err, wrong. Anyway, you get a list of five questions that you have to answer wrongly. You get a point for each wrong answer, and five points if you get them all before the buzzer goes off. We didn't bother with the points, and after a while we ignored the buzzer. It was just a lot of fun to see what kinds of answers people would give to the most obvious questions.
"Who is the governor of this state?"
"You are!"
Much fun was had by all. Then, Shawn began to talk to Stephanie (My sister-in-law) about whether or not she meets a lot of athiests at her work. Now, it is important to note what she does. Stephanie is a post-graduate working on her doctorate in physical chemistry. Or chemical physics. Errm. Whatever.
Her answer to Shawn's question was that it rarely ever comes up in conversation. This lead into an interesting statement she made about people interacting. To sum it up, when two people are arguing diametrically opposed viewpoints, if neither person is willing to see where the other is coming from, there can be no communication. They set up a wall between them that neither of them is willing to cross, and which stays between them, preventing any kind of meaningful conversation.
To be specific, in the Evolution vs. Creationism debate, the argument often goes like this:
Creationist: So, the way it works is, God Created everything, and that is where things came from.
Evolutionist: But, there is no god. So, there must be another explanation.
Creationist: No, there is a God, you just don't believe in Him.
Evolutionist: What are you talking about? We happened because of a series of, as yet unexplained coincidences.
Creationist: Oh? So, what you are saying is, you have faith that this unexplained set of coincidences happened, but you deny my faith that there is a God?
Evolutionist: I don't have faith. I simply know.
And that is where the argument breaks down. Neither side is at all willing to see what the other side is saying, and so they just go around in circles. If you ever want to effectively communicate (and this applies anywhere) then you need to be willing, for just one minute, to say, "Okay, I see where you are coming from, however..." and then explain why you disagree, rather then simply restating your point over and over and over again.
As to myself, I believe that there must be a God. There are many reasons for not believing it, and for not wanting to believe it, and I accept that others may have chosen those reasons. I will not tell them they are wrong. I will tell them that I have made my choice, and explain to them, if they want to know, why I have made that choice. I will even listen while they explain why they have made their choice. All the world will be a better place for it.
Without debate, there can be no communication. For through debate, we define our world. How else could we know what other people were thinking?